South Carolina FYI

Menu
  • What’s Trending
  • Featured
  • Eat & Drink
  • News
  • Guest Columns
  • Submit Your Thoughts

legislation

News

McMaster Pushes To Re-open Schools This Fall

On Wednesday, July 15th, Gov. Henry McMaster joined by his fellow Republican House and Senate leaders executively decided that SC schools will re-open for in-person teaching. This press statement comes as COVID-19 cases continue to surge in the state. The district schools are being pushed to re-open with the option to choose between virtual learning and face-to-face learning.

McMaster says that “the classroom is one of the safest places to be,” in response to fear over Coronavirus. These plans are being made as the state believes that virtual education is not enough. Each district ultimately can decide a plan for themselves, yet now there must be an option that includes sending kids to school five days a week. As of 2019, SC schools remain #48 in state education across the country. It’s likely that the recent changes in schooling could impact the education kids receive. “What we need to do is take every step at our disposal to get kids back to schools,” McMaster said.

With this push to re-open comes a push for start dates to be halted. McMaster asks that schools consider beginning classes after September 8th, in addition to creating options for online and in-person learning.

There has been no official statement from SC school boards regarding final decisions for the upcoming fall semester. In the next few weeks, it’s possible we will see districts announcing plans that rotate between in-person and online classes.

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Email

News

South Carolina Announces More Restrictions as COVID-19 Cases Rise

The SC case count for Coronavirus skyrockets to over 62,245 as of mid-July. In response to the large number of residents contracting the virus, the state announces more restrictions. Gov. Henry McMaster says, “We know that young adults who are rapidly contracting the virus and spreading it into our communities frequently congregate in late-night atmospheres which simply are not conducive to stopping its continued transmission.” 

This late-night curfew on the sale of alcohol is to be implemented immediately. Restaurants and bars will no longer be allowed to converge past 11 p.m. This order omits alcohol sold at convenience or grocery stores. It’s merely a precaution meant to stop young people from spreading the disease at drinking establishments. As the disease weaves through the younger generation, it’s difficult to enforce social distancing. Because many adolescents do not show symptoms of the virus, this makes transmission much more likely.

As well as the late-night curfew, McMaster rolled out limited visitation to nursing homes on July 2nd. This came as a safety precaution toward an at-risk age group, and in order to protect front line healthcare workers, McMaster tells in a tweet. These restrictions are to be enforced until further notice.

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Email

News

Columbia Metropolitan Airport to Receive Millions From Government 

In an effort to improve the safety and efficiency of the Columbia Metropolitan Airport, Secretary of Transportation Elaine L. Chao announced some improvements are in the works. With the help of a federal grant of $2,744,932, the Columbia hub will see more than just a fresh coat of paint. 

This year Trump delegated $10 billion in grants for improving aviation and airports across the U.S. As coronavirus has changed the way many are traveling, airports and the travel industry have taken a hard hit. This money simultaneously acts as a relief effort for those of the industry struggling. 

The funding comes directly from “the U.S. Treasury Grand Fund to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency,” the Federal Aviation Administration explains in their frequently asked questions. Titled the “CARES Act”, the abbreviation stands for Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security.

Columbia will implement this money through improvements made around the terminal building. Beginning with in-line bagging systems, new escalators, and baggage carousels, the changes will help streamline the traveling experience.

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Email

News

SC Governor to Reopen Public Attraction Facilities

Prior to memorial day weekend, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster stated that public attractions are now allowed to reopen throughout South Carolina.

The facilities themselves cover a large span of locales. From zoos and museums to parks and go-kart tracks, people are once again allowed to enjoy their services. This excludes nightclubs, bowling alleys, sporting events, and any other indoor activities where you could be within close proximity to others. The 6-feet-apart social distancing rule is still suggested.

The Carowinds amusement park is excluded as they’ve chosen to remain closed. 

McMaster announced that youth and adult sporting leagues are now welcome to host practices. In Master’s guidelines for re-opening, he states “The value of team sports as a form of recreation that provides positive impacts on both individual physical health and the social health of our communities.” Outdoor activities, especially in the summer, are a large part of the South Carolina community. 

Effective May 31st, practices return. Effective June 15th, games and competitions return. This slow integration is in response to coronavirus and public health recommendations. 

McMaster reinforces communication, sanitation, and hydration during this transition. With these pillars in place, he is hopeful sporting events will return in a safely this summer.

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Email

News

South Carolina Lawmakers Issues Santee Cooper and Education

3 Things That Happened During South Carolina’s Three-Day Special Legislative Session

Featured Image Source: Andrew Whitaker, Post & Courier

South Carolina’s regular legislative session came to an end early last month, but lawmakers returned to the statehouse a few weeks later for a three-day special session.

Having finished their special session a day early, lawmakers met on May 21 and May 22 to discuss legislation and finalize the budget. And, of the legislation being reviewed, two major bills were up for debate, including Santee Cooper and the Carolina Panthers.

The Largest Budget In State History Was Passed

Both the House and Senate passed the largest budget in state history with a total spending package of $29.8 billion with a 105-6 and 32-8 vote, respectively. Revisions to the budget include the removal of provisos that would have added tolls along I-95 and a reduction of the “Be Pro Be Proud” program, which is a program that started in Arkansas and tours the state to give students exposure to industries. Originally $950,000 of the budget was allocated to the program before being reduced to $642,500.

Lawmakers Agreed To Explore The Sale of Santee Cooper

Lawmakers adopted a final version of the resolution which will allow the Department of Administration to oversee the process of collecting and reviewing bids for state-owned Santee Cooper. The Department will hire experts to assist it in analyzing and recommending three proposals to be passed along to lawmakers. The three proposals will consist of one purchase offer from a third-party, one management offer and a final reform proposal from Santee Cooper. While this resolution was passed, the future of Santee Cooper is still undecided and will likely be decided during the next legislative session, continuing to leave Santee Cooper direct serve and coop customers without any relief from the VC Summer debt while SCANA customers have already received some rate relief from the debt.

Carolina Panthers Receive Major Tax Breaks

According to the newly adopted Carolina Panthers resolution, the Panthers don’t have to pay state income taxes for players, coaches, or other employees for the next 15 years as long as they build their new complex near Rock Hill. Governor McMaster is hoping the Panthers’ move to South Carolina will create jobs for many South Carolinians.

South Carolina’s next regular legislative session will start back up in January 2020.

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Email

Featured

South Carolina Senators Recognize Missteps By Santee Cooper’s Leadership And Discuss The Future Of Santee Cooper

Yesterday marked the first day that South Carolina legislators started the discussion on legislation that would authorize the State Department of Administration to move forward with a competitive bidding process for Santee Cooper.

Senator Leatherman, R-Florence, kicked off the conversation with Senator Rankin, R-Horry, noting the missteps taken by Santee Cooper’s leadership. He finished by stating he didn’t favor selling nor favor keeping Santee Cooper and felt that they needed to review all options before making a decision.

Following Sen. Leatherman was Senator Massey, R-Edgefield, who gave more background on how Santee Cooper got in this position in the first place, “We need to take a few steps back before we get into a conversation –before we talk about whether to sell or not to sell — to figure out how we got in this position.”

He went on to explain that back in the 2007-2008 timeframe, Santee Cooper and, at the time, SCANA announced their decision to pursue nuclear power. At that time both companies entered into a partnership and began their failed V.C. Summer nuclear project.

Due to the fact that South Carolina hadn’t constructed a nuclear power generating plant in over forty years, both companies decided to hire Westinghouse to help move the project forward. However, they quickly realized that Westinghouse wasn’t competent enough to handle the project.

Fast forward to August 31, 2017, when the announcement to abandon the project was made.

Senator Massey went on to disclose that if you were to look at documents dating back to 2011 there were already conversations going on that proved Santee Cooper leadership knew this project was going downhill and was going to fail. However, not one time did Santee Cooper leadership bring any of these issues to the general assembly. They continued their involvement and as Sen. Massey said, “they kept plunging money into [the project].”

He pointed out that about 5 percent of customers’ utility rates is going towards paying off the V.C. Summer debt and Santee Cooper is projecting that rates will rise between 12 and 14 percent for years to come to help pay off the debt. Which he said was just “Santee Cooper’s estimates.”

While this has been ongoing for many months, all senators who spoke today made it a point to say that they didn’t want to rush into a decision. But, Sen. Massey grew frustrated that this has been going on for so long and nothing has been done to fix these issues.

Having been involved in conversations from the time it was finally brought to light by Santee Cooper leadership, Sen. Massey said “One of the things that frustrates me is this didn’t happen yesterday. We all learned about it almost two years ago and they really haven’t done a whole lot to fix any of the problems.”

While a decision won’t be made today or even tomorrow, Sen. Leatherman made sure to note that he had no intentions in sending this issue back to the joint-committee, and Sen. Massey hopes to have a decision before the end of this legislative session in May.

Whatever decision they come to, the Senate recognizes that Santee Cooper might not have the right leadership in place. “There’s a real question whether they have people in the decision making positions they need to be for running a utility,” Sen. Massey stated.

The conversation is set to continue tomorrow.

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Email

Featured

Santee Cooper Debt

South Carolina Senate To Begin Debate On The Sale Of Santee Cooper

Featured Image Source: Tim Dominick, The State

Last month, South Carolina Senate President Harvey Peeler introduced legislation that would allow Governor McMaster to oversee the sale of state-owned utility Santee Cooper.

McMaster has been vocal about his support for the sale due to their enormous and increasing $7.2 billion debt; however, many Senators were hesitant at the start. Support for the sale began to increase after key Santee Cooper executives were unable to answer many questions asked by senators during their testimony.

One question they were unable to answer is how the debt would be paid without raising utility rates for the next four decades, worrying Santee Cooper direct-serve and coop customers and South Carolina taxpayers.

With town hall meetings being held all over the state to discuss the Santee Cooper issue, many South Carolina residents expressed their concerns. Senior citizens on fixed incomes voiced their fear of rising rates and possibly not being able to afford power.

In a recent survey, 71% of participants said they favored selling Santee Cooper to a private utility and getting the government out of the utility business.

After months of weighing options and waiting, the Senate will begin to debate on the legislation today, Tuesday, April 23, and if passed, it will allow the governor’s administration to begin a competitive bidding process.

There are already bids that have been reviewed by ICF International, a Virginia-based consulting firm, and four of those bids were full-purchase proposals. Three of the four would pay off the debt with no request to recover the costs and the fourth bid would fully assume the debt.

While Santee Cooper has some of the lowest utility rates in the state, a change from previously having the lowest rates after a 5% rate increase a few years ago to help cover the already building debt from the V.C. Summer project, this isn’t expected to stay the same if the utility is not sold. Customers will continue to see rate increases for years to come if the government continues to run Santee Cooper.

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Email

Featured

South Carolina Beer Fight

Beer Fight Brewing Again In South Carolina

Over the past couple of years, the craft beer scene has exploded across South Carolina. This is in part thanks to the hard work of the SC Brewers Guild who has led the charge in getting many of the bills passed that make craft breweries possible in the Palmetto State.

It hasn’t been an easy fight though and it’s far from over. Craft breweries across the state are seeking less restriction, and the SC Wholesalers Association is fighting tooth and nail to keep a tight grip on the industry, and their profits.

After a few key legislative losses, the SC Wholesalers Association replaced most of their leadership team with a new set of leadership. As a result, the SC Brewers Guild and Wholesalers Association were both hoping to build a new working relationship. This would be a huge change from the rocky and adversarial past they shared.

Hopeful of this new relationship, the SC Brewers Guild met with representatives from SC Wholesalers Association to present six bills to change current legislation regarding beer laws and help move both the craft beer and wholesale industries forward. Both hoping for a mutually beneficial compromise (before resorting to an expensive and extensive lobbying battle), the SC Brewers Guild proposed the following:

  1. Changing the current limited distribution system to allow breweries to self-distribute and to distribute to a limited area around their brewing location.
  2. Franchise reform – Currently, once a brewery enters into a contract with a distributor, that distributor owns the breweries brand and there is no exit clause for the brewery.
  3. Lowering beer taxes.
  4. Removing the current limit on how much beer people can buy on-site from a craft brewery.
  5. Allowing breweries to open up additional taprooms across the state. Currently, breweries are limited to one taproom per owner.
  6. Allowing breweries to distribute to themselves, meaning allow them to distribute beer from one location to another if they have more than one location. As the law stands now, breweries can have separate locations but they have to sell their own beer to a distributor who will then mark it up 30-50% and the second location would have to buy back the marked-up beer.

After further discussion, review, and a commitment to a mutually agreeable compromise, the first three of the six bills were eliminated. And, yesterday a South Carolina Senate Judiciary Subcommittee met to hear testimony from both SC Wholesalers Association and the SC Brewers Guild on the three remaining bills.

Wesley Donehue, owner of Frothy Beard Brewing Company and member of the SC Brewers Guild, was present to give testimony. Many of the points in his testimony were centered around free-market enterprise and that the SC Brewers Guild is simply meeting demands created by the market, an inherently American principle.

Most of this arcane restriction comes from the Palmetto State’s antiquated three-tiered system which was set up in the 1930s after the 21st amendment repealed prohibition so that the government could control the flow of alcohol. In this system, breweries are the first tier and are restricted by the second tier which is the wholesalers. A system that Donehue thinks is going away on its own, “We aren’t here to argue the antiquated nature of a system set up in 1933. Frankly, that system is coming to an end anyway.”

During his testimony, Donehue insisted that instead of fighting this system, the SC Brewers Guild is simply asking for the ability to grow and meet the demands of their consumers, stating “All we want is the ability to work our tails off and grow. We aren’t asking for any special handouts. All we want is for government to get out of our way so that we can meet the demands of the consumers. That’s how the free market is supposed to work. That is how America is supposed to work.”

A point which SC Brewers Guild Executive Director, Brook Bristow, reiterated in his testimony, “I don’t want to assert that our intention is to completely change the rules that we need to play by. Far from it, in fact,” he continued, “But we also need to find ways to nurture the growth that we’re seeing, while also finding ways for us to stay competitive with neighboring states who have found those kind of solutions to these same problems.”

After hearing from all sides, the committee decided it would be best if the SC Brewers Guild and SC Wholesalers Association try to work together over the next two weeks to come up with agreed upon compromised language.

A move which the SC Brewers Guild says they’ve been trying to do for the past five months and has failed.

Heading into today’s meeting, the SC Brewers Guild was under the impression that SC Wholesalers supported the off-premise bill (bill four above), and the last two proposed bills would be fought in legislature. However, upon meeting, the SC Wholesalers changed position and refused to support the bill they once told the Guild they would.

Disheartened, Donehue took to Facebook to ask for help, “They hold all the cards – they have all the power. We have eighty-something breweries right now in South Carolina and the majority are all small businesses who don’t have the money that the wholesalers have and can’t throw thousand dollar checks at our legislators like the wholesalers do.”

Watch the full video below:

The next S.C. Senate Judiciary Subcommittee meeting is scheduled in two weeks and Donehue plans on launching and leading a full grassroots campaign to help the South Carolina craft beer industry grow and get past the restrictions they are currently under.

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Email
Next Page »

© 2025 South Carolina FYI. All Rights Reserved.

  • Home
  • What’s Trending
  • Featured
  • Eat & Drink
  • News
  • Guest Columns
  • Santee Cooper
  • Medical Marijuana
  • Submit Your Thoughts